Aim and background: Precision of optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements of the optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) is essential for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of retinal and ONH parameters measured with two identical swept-source optical coherence devices.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 30 eyes of 15 healthy subjects were included. Two technicians performed four OCT-wide protocol scans in the same visit using two identical Triton swept-source OCT (DRI-OCT) instruments. The interdevice and interobserver reproducibility and the repeatability of both instruments for all ONH, RNFL, and macular GCL parameters were evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Additionally, Bland–Altman test analysis was used for repeatability and reproducibility measurements.
Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) of the ONH, RNFL, and GCL measurements were excellent for repeatability and interdevice reproducibility (>0.9). Interobserver reproducibility was good for all parameters except for RNFL clock hour 11 (ICC = 0.72). The variability of the average RNFL was from −4.103 to 4.97 µm, with a mean percentage of the difference (PD) of 0.37 ± 2.03%. Among GCL parameters, the greatest variability was found in the inferior sector (PD = −0.88 ± 5.39%, limits of agreement (LoA) = −8.345–7.078 μm).
Conclusion: Using two identical swept-source OCT instruments for the evaluation of the structural parameters of the ONH, RNFL, and macular GCL showed high repeatability and reproducibility. This allows the clinician to make a therapeutic decision based on OCT findings coupled with the clinical evaluation of the patient. When evaluating RNFL clock hours measurements, interobserver reproducibility might decrease.
Clinical significance: The understanding of measurement variability while using different devices and the impact of the observer capturing the images, is clinically relevant.
Stamper RL, Lieberman MF, Drake M V. Becker - Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas. 8th ed. Mosby/Elsevier; 2009. 561p.
Wang AY, Lee PY, Bui BV, et al. Potential mechanisms of retinal ganglion cell type-specific vulnerability in glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 2020;103(5):562–571. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.13031
Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139(1):44–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.069
Wollstein G, Kagemann L, Bilonick RA, et al. Retinal nerve fibre layer and visual function loss in glaucoma: the tipping point. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(1):47–52. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.196907
Hammel N, Belghith A, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparing the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer loss in healthy eyes and in glaucoma eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;178:38–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.008
Khanal S, Davey PG, Racette L, et al. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness for discriminating primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma using optical coherence tomography. Clin Exp Optom 2016;99(4):373–381. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12366
Nakanishi H, Akagi T, Hangai M, et al. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting early glaucoma in eyes with high myopia from normative database of macular ganglion cell complex thickness obtained from normal non-myopic or highly myopic Asian eyes. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;253(7):1143–1152. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3026-y
Kim KE, Jeoung JW, Park KH, et al. Diagnostic classification of macular ganglion cell and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: differentiation of false-positives from glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2015;122(3):502–510. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.031
Xu X, Xiao H, Guo X, et al. Diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in glaucoma suspects. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(51):e9182. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009182
Shin JW, Sung KR, Lee GC, et al. Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer change detected by optical coherence tomography indicates progression in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2017;124(10):1466–1474. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.023
Laíns I, Wang JC, Cui Y, et al. Retinal applications of swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Prog Retin Eye Res 2021;84:100951. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100951
Satue M, Gavin A, Orduna E, et al. Reproducibility and reliability of retinal and optic disc measurements obtained with swept-source optical coherence tomography in a healthy population. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2019;63(2):165–171. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-018-00647-2
Lee SY, Bae HW, Kwon HJ, et al. Repeatability and agreement of swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography evaluations of thickness sectors in normal eyes. J Glaucoma 2017;26(2):e46–e53. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000536
Carpineto P, Nubile M, Agnifili L, et al. Reproducibility and repeatability of CirrusTM HD-OCT peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements in young normal subjects. Ophthalmologica 2012;227(3):139–145. DOI: 10.1159/000334967
Arthur SN, Smith SD, Wright MM, et al. Reproducibility and agreement in evaluating retinal nerve fibre layer thickness between Stratus and Spectralis OCT. Eye (Lond) 2011;25(2):192–200. DOI: 10.1159/000334967
Hwang YH, Lee JY, Kim YY. The effect of head tilt on the measurements of retinal nerve fibre layer and macular thickness by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95(11): 1547–1551. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.194118
Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One 2019;14(10):e0223114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
Yang Z, Tatham AJ, Zangwill LM, et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer imaging by swept-source optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159(1):193–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.019
Yang H, Lee HS, Bae HW, et al. Effect of image quality fluctuations on the repeatability of thickness measurements in swept-source optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):13897. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70852-y
