Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2022 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage

Kevin Wang, Jay C Wang, Soshian Sarrafpour

Keywords : Anticoagulation, Case report, Cerebral vascular accident, Glaucoma, Hypotony, Kissing suprachoroidal hemorrhage, Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, Postoperative complications, Surgical drainage, XEN45 gel implant

Citation Information : Wang K, Wang JC, Sarrafpour S. Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after XEN Gel Implant Requiring Surgical Drainage. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022; 16 (2):132-135.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1378

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To describe a case of a patient on anticoagulation who underwent XEN45 (XEN) gel stent placement and subsequently developed kissing suprachoroidal hemorrhages (SCHs) requiring surgical drainage. Background: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) aims to achieve effective control of intraocular pressure (IOP) while minimizing the complications associated with traditional glaucoma surgeries. Rarely, a severe complication of intraocular surgery is SCH, which can result from early postoperative hypotony. The XEN gel stent is a MIGS device that theoretically avoids the risk of hypotony due to its outflow resistance properties. However, cases of SCH associated with XEN gel stents have been reported. Case description: A monocular 86-year-old Caucasian male with glaucoma and atrial fibrillation on rivaroxaban underwent routine XEN gel stent placement with mitomycin C in his only seeing eye. On postoperative day 3, he presented with severe eye pain and worsening vision. He was found to have a SCH that gradually progressed to kissing suprachoroidals that required surgical drainage. After extensive discussion, the decision was made to hold the patient's rivaroxaban given his monocular status. The patient subsequently had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) 1 week after drainage, but his symptoms gradually resolved after restarting anticoagulation. Two months after drainage, the patient's SCH had completely resolved, and he had recovered baseline visual acuity with excellent IOP control-off medications. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of quick and appropriate management of complications following glaucoma surgery, as well as discussion with patients regarding risks of treatments and return precautions. It also is a reminder that although many new surgical interventions are “minimally invasive,” those like the XEN that are more effective at IOP control may have a similar risk profile to more traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy. As such, risk factors like anticoagulation use and older age should be considered in anticipation of surgical intervention. Clinical significance: The XEN gel stent is a new surgical option for glaucoma patients that asserts a better safety profile than traditional surgeries like trabeculectomy, but our case of kissing SCHs requiring surgical intervention following XEN placement reminds us that even minimally invasive surgeries can have devastating complications.


PDF Share
  1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121(11):2081–2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
  2. Ruderman JM, Harbin TS, Campbell DG. Postoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage following filtration procedures. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104(2):201–205. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050140055019
  3. Wirostko WJ, Han DP, Mieler WF, et al. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage: outcome of surgical management according to hemorrhage severity. Ophthalmology 1998;105(12):2271–2275. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91228-3
  4. Liu JC, Green W, Sheybani A, et al. Intraoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage during XEN gel stent implantation. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2020;17:100600. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100600
  5. Prokosch-Willing V, Vossmerbaeumer U, Hoffmann E, et al. Suprachoroidal bleeding after XEN gel implantation. J Glaucoma 2017;26(12):e261–e263. DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000795
  6. Rooney DM, Shadid HR, Siegel LI, et al. Postoperative complications of ab interno gelatin microstent. J Glaucoma 2019;28(5):e77–e81. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001194
  7. Sheybani A, Reitsamer H, Ahmed II. Fluid dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56(8):4789–4795. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-16625
  8. Friberg L, Rosenqvist M, Lip GY. Evaluation of risk stratification schemes for ischaemic stroke and bleeding in 182 678 patients with atrial fibrillation: the Swedish Atrial Fibrillation cohort study. Eur Heart J 2012;33(12):1500–1510. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr488
  9. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Veterans Affairs Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1992;327(20):1406–1412. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199211123272002
  10. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The effect of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1990;323(22):1505–1511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199107113250213
  11. Law SK, Song BJ, Yu F, et al. Hemorrhagic complications from glaucoma surgery in patients on anticoagulation therapy or antiplatelet therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145(4):736–746. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.007
  12. Tuli SS, WuDunn D, Ciulla TA, et al. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after glaucoma filtration procedures. Ophthalmology 2001;108(10):1808–1811. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00763-1
  13. Jeganathan VS, Ghosh S, Ruddle JB, et al. Risk factors for delayed suprachoroidal haemorrhage following glaucoma surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92(10):1393–1396. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.141689
  14. Hsiao SF, Shih MH, Huang FC. Spontaneous suprachoroidal hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2016;6(1):36–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjo.2014.10.008
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.