Aim: To compare the usefulness of gonioscopy performed by general ophthalmologists (GO) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber.
Methods: Forty-four patients with a shallow anterior chamber (defined by a ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness lower than 1/2) were included in this cross-sectional study. Gonioscopy was performed in all subjects by two glaucoma experts (GE1 and GE2) and one GO. Anterior segment imaging was performed using Visante® OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc.). Agreement between examiners was assessed with first-order agreement coefficients (AC1). Diagnostic accuracies of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curves.
Results: For static gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was substantial (AC1 = 0.65), and that between GE1 and GO was moderate (AC1 = 0.50). For indentation gonioscopy, the agreement between GE1 and GE2 was slightly lower (AC1 = 0.55); however, the agreement between GE1 and GO showed a larger reduction (AC1 = 0.12). GO's gonioscopy presented a low specificity (25%) and the AROC to angle closure detection was lower than AS-OCT (0.56–0.73). Combined information of GO gonioscopy and AS-OCT improved specificity (85.7%) and AROC (0.77) of angle closure evaluation.
Conclusion: Agreement between GO and glaucoma experts was moderate for static gonioscopy and slight for indentation gonioscopy. AS-OCT performed better than GO gonioscopy in detecting angle closure in patients with a shallow anterior chamber. The addition of AS-OCT to clinical information in patients with GO positive gonioscopy improved the specificity and AROC of gonioscopy test.
Smith SD, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Evaluation of the anterior chamber angle in glaucoma: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2013;120(10):1985–1997. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.034
Wang L, Huang W, Huang S, et al. Ten-year incidence of primary angle closure in elderly Chinese: the liwan eye study. Br J Ophthalmol 2019;103(3):355–360. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311808
Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68(4):626–629. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(69)91241-0
Johnson TV, Ramulu PY, Quigley HA, et al. Low sensitivity of the Van Herick method for detecting gonioscopic angle closure independent of observer expertise. Am J Ophthalmol 2018;195:63–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.026
Foster PJ. The epidemiology of primary angle closure and associated glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Semin Ophthalmol 2002;17(2):50–58. DOI: 10.1076/soph.126.96.36.19918
Teixeira F, Sousa DC, Leal I, et al. Automated gonioscopy photography for iridocorneal angle grading. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020;30(1):112–118. DOI: 10.1177/1120672118806436
Salim S. The role of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. J Ophthalmol 2012;2012:476801. DOI: 10.1155/2012/476801
Nongpiur ME, Tun TA, Aung T. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: is there a clinical role in the management of primary angle closure disease? J Glaucoma 2020;29(1):60–66. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001355
Qin B, Francis BA, Li Y, et al. Anterior chamber angle measurements using Schwalbe's line with high-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2013;22(9):684–688. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318264b921
Lavanya R, Foster PJ, Sakata LM, et al. Screening for narrow angles in the Singapore population: evaluation of new noncontact screening methods. Ophthalmology 2008;115(10):1720–1727, 1727e.1–1727e.2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.015
Nolan WP, See JL, Chew PT, et al. Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology 2007;114(1):33–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.073
Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology 2008;115(5):769–774. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030
Chansangpetch S, Rojanapongpun P, Lin SC. Anterior segment imaging for angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2018;188:xvi–xxix. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.006
Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2008;61(Pt 1):29–48. DOI: 10.1348/000711006X126600
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44(3):837–845.
Moghimi S, Fathollahzadeh N, Chen R, et al. Comparison of fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure and phacomorphic angle closure. J Glaucoma 2019;28(3):194–200. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001167
Tun TA, Baskaran M, Perera SA, et al. Sectoral variations of iridocorneal angle width and iris volume in Chinese Singaporeans: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;252(7):1127–1132. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2636-0
Liu S, Yu M, Ye C, et al. Anterior chamber angle imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography: an investigation on variability of angle measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52(12):8598–8603. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7507