Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles


New Strategies for Automated Perimetry: Historical Perspective and Future Innovations

Sylvia L Groth

Citation Information : Groth SL. New Strategies for Automated Perimetry: Historical Perspective and Future Innovations. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021; 15 (3):103-105.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1321

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 27-01-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


  1. Traquair HM. An Introduction to Clinical Perimetry. 5th ed., London: Henry Kimpton; 1946. pp. 1–16.
  2. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, et al. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual goldmann perimetry. Ophthalmology 1995;102(1):21–26. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95) 31060-3.
  3. Donahue SP. Perimetry techniques in neuro-ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999;10(6):420–428. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-199912000-00009.
  4. Heijl A, Patella VM, Bengtsson B. Excellent Perimetry; the Field Analyzer Primer. 5th ed., Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; 2021.
  5. Khoury JM, Donahue SP, Lavin PJM, et al. Comparison of 24-2 and 30-2 perimetry in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies. J Neuroophthalmol 1999;19(2):100–108. DOI: 10.1097/00041327-199906000-00004.
  6. Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the humphrey field analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 1993;100(6):949–954. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31551-6.
  7. Schaumberger M, Schafer B, Lachenmayr BJ. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the humphrey field analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(7):1390–1397.
  8. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, et al. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimtery, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75(4):368–375. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00392.x.
  9. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76(2):165–169. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760208.x.
  10. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. SITA fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76(4):431–437. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x.
  11. Heijl A, Patella VM, Chong LX, et al. A new SITA perimetric threshold testing algorithm: construction and a multicenter clinical study. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;198:154–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.010.
  12. Razeghinejad R, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Myers JS, et al. Preliminary report on a novel virtual reality perimeter compared with standard automated perimetry. J Glaucoma 2021;30(1):17–23. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001670.
  13. Groth SL, Linton E, Brown EN, et al. Novel virtual-reality perimetry in normal children compared to humphry field analyzer. ARVO annual meeting abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62:3391.
  14. Mees L, Upadhyaya S, Kumar P, et al. Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality field screening device. J Glaucoma 2020;29(2):86–91. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.
  15. Greenfield JA, Deiner M, Nguyen A, et al. Measurement reproducibility using vivid vision perimetry: a virtual reality-based mobile platform. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4800.
  16. Stapelfeldt J, Kucur SS, Huber N, et al. Virtual reality-based and conventional visual field examination comparison in healthy and glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021;10(12):10. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.10.
  17. Wroblewski D, Francis BA, Sadun A, et al. Testing of visual field with virtual reality goggles in manual and visual grasp modes. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:206082. DOI: 10.1155/2014/206082.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.