Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  18 (2024)
Volume  17 (2023)
Volume  16 (2022)
Volume  15 (2021)
Volume  14 (2020)
Volume  13 (2019)
Volume  12 (2018)
Volume  11 (2017)
Volume  10 (2016)
Volume  9 (2015)
Volume  8 (2014)
Volume  7 (2013)
Volume  6 (2012)
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

EDITORIAL

Revisiting Results of Conventional Surgery: Trabeculectomy, Glaucoma Drainage Devices, and Deep Sclerectomy in the Era of MIGS

Deepika Dhingra, Tarek Shaarawy

Citation Information : Dhingra D, Shaarawy T. Revisiting Results of Conventional Surgery: Trabeculectomy, Glaucoma Drainage Devices, and Deep Sclerectomy in the Era of MIGS. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2019; 13 (2):45-49.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1248

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract
HTML PDF Share
  1. Gabal A, Cimarosti R, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs non-penetrating surgeries in open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. J Glaucoma 2019 Jul 18. DOI: 10.1097/IJG. 0000000000001323.
  2. Sawchyn AK, Slabaugh MA. Innovations and adaptations in trabeculectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2016;27:158–163. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000236.
  3. Tseng VL, Coleman AL, et al. Aqueous shunts for glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017 Jul 28;7:CD004918. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004918.pub3.
  4. Lavia C, Dallorto L, et al. Minimally minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183142.
  5. Vinod K, Gedde SJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma 2017;26:687–693. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000720.
  6. Bloom P, Au L. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a poor substitute for trabeculectomy—the great debate. Ophthalmol Ther 2018;7:203–210. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-018-0135-9.
  7. Aslan F, Yuce B, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2018;38:2005–2012. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0691-3.
  8. Al-Mugheiry TS, Cate H, et al. Microinvasive Glaucoma Stent (MIGS) Surgery with Concomitant Phakoemulsification Cataract Extraction: Outcomes and the Learning Curve. J Glaucoma 2017;26:646–651. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000691.
  9. Craven ER, Katz LJ, et al. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:1339–1345. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025.
  10. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Combined iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation and phacoemulsification for coexistent open-angle glaucoma and cataract: a long-term study. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:645–649. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300218.
  11. Fea AM, Consolandi G, et al. Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:795357. DOI: 10.1155/2015/795357.
  12. Arriola-Villalobos P, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Glaukos iStent inject® Trabecular Micro-Bypass Implantation Associated with Cataract Surgery in Patients with Coexisting Cataract and Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Long-Term Study. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:1056573. DOI: 10.1155/2016/1056573.
  13. Katz JL, Erb C, et al. Prospective, randomized study of one, two, or three trabecular bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma subjects on topical hypotensive medication. Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:2313–2320. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S96695.
  14. Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. A Randomized Trial of a Schlemm's Canal Microstent with Phacoemulsification for Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2015;122: 1283–1293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031.
  15. Gandolfi SA, Ungaro N, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and Schlemm's canal scaffold at 24 months’ follow-up. J Ophthalmol 2016;5:3410469. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3410469.
  16. Widder RA, Dietlein TS, et al. The Xen45 gel stent as a minimally invasive procedure in glaucoma surgery: Success rates, risk profile, and rates of re-surgery after 261 surgeries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256:765–771. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3899-7.
  17. Batlle JF, Fantes F, et al. Three-Year Follow-up of a Novel Aqueous Humor Micro Shunt. J Glaucoma 2016;25:e58–e65. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000368.
  18. Francis BA, Berke SJ, et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40: 1313–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021.
  19. Siegel MJ, Boling WS, et al. Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;43:531–539. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12510.
  20. Haibo T, Xin K, et al. Comparison of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118142.
  21. Namavari A, Hyde RA, et al. Primary Baerveldt shunt implantation: Outcomes and complications. Ophthalmol Ther 2016;5:253–262. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-016-0056-4.
  22. Cheng JW, Xi GL, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery augmented with mitomycin C in treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Can J Ophthalmol 2009;44:76–82. DOI: 10.3129/i08-165.
  23. De Gregorio A, Pedrotti E, et al. Minimally invasive combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: clinic results of the smallest ab interno gel stent. Int Ophthalmol 2018;38:1129–1134. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0571-x.
  24. Patel I, de Klerk TA, et al. Manchester iStent study: early results from a prospective UK case series. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41:648–652. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12098.
  25. Belovay GW, Nagi A, et al. Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:1911–1917. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017.
  26. Gandolfi SA, Ungaro N, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and Schlemm's canal scaffold at 24 months’ follow-up. J Ophthalmol 2016;5:3410469. DOI: 10.1155/2016/3410469.
  27. Vold S, Ahmed IK, et al. Two-year COMPASS trial results: supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open angle glaucoma and cataracts. Ophthalmology 2016;123:2103–2112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032.
  28. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, et al. Treatment outcomes in the tube vs trabeculectomy (TVT) Study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:789–803. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026.
  29. Budenz DL, Barton K, et al. Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study. Ophthalmology 2015;122: 308–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.043.
  30. Hoeh H, Vold SD, et al. Initial clinical experience with the CyPass micro-stent: Safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary microstent. J Glaucoma 2016;25:106–112. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000134.
  31. Galal A, Bilgic A, et al. Xen glaucoma implant with mitomycin-C 1-year follow-up: result and complications. J Ophthalmol 2017;2017:5457246. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5457246.
  32. Tran DH, Souza C, et al. Comparison of long-term surgical success of Ahmed valve implant vs trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1504–1509. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.150870.
  33. Brandão LM, Grieshaber MC. Update on Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) and New Implants. J Ophthalmol 2013;2013:705915. DOI: 10.1155/2013/705915.
  34. Zhou M, Wang W, et al. Trabeculectomy with vs without releasable sutures for glaucoma-A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Ophthalmol 2014;14:41. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-41.
  35. Casson R, Rahman R, et al. Long term results and complications of trabeculectomy with low dose mitomycin C in patients at risk of filtration failure. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:686–688. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.6.686.
  36. Garcia-Feijoo J, Rau M, et al. Supraciliary micro-stent implantation for open-angle glaucoma failing topical therapy: 1-year results of a multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159:1075–1081. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018.
  37. Popovic M, Campos-Moller X, et al. Efficacy and Adverse Event Profile of the iStent and iStent Inject Trabecular Micro-bypass for Open-angle Glaucoma: A Meta-analysis. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018;12:67–84. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1248.
  38. Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, et al. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology 2011;118:459–467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007.
  39. Landers J, Martin K, et al. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 2011;119: 694–702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043.
  40. Yalvac IS, Nurozler A, et al. The results of trabeculectomy with and without Mitomycin C in young patients. Ophthalmologica 1998;212:399–403. DOI: 10.1159/000027375.
  41. Montolío Marzo S, Lanzagorta Aresti A, et al. Malignant glaucoma after XEN45 implant. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2019;94:134–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2018.10.023.
  42. Heidinger A, Schwab C, et al. A retrospective study of 199 xen45 stent implantations from 2014 to 2016. J Glaucoma 2019;28:75–79. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001122.
  43. Grover DS, Flynn WJ, et al. Performance and safety of a new ab interno gelatin stent in refractory glaucoma at 12 months. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;183:25–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.023.
  44. Tham YC, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081–2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.