Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

Surgical Technique

The Blitz Anesthesia Technique in Non-English Speaking Patients Undergoing Glaucoma Surgery

Parul Ichhpujani, Arun Prasad, Scott J Fudemberg, Marlene R Moster

Keywords : Blitz anesthesia, Trabeculectomy, Eye safety, Glaucoma

Citation Information : Ichhpujani P, Prasad A, J Fudemberg S, R Moster M. The Blitz Anesthesia Technique in Non-English Speaking Patients Undergoing Glaucoma Surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2012; 6 (2):91-93.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1112

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-08-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: To describe a less invasive method of providing anesthesia in non-English speaking patients undergoing glaucoma surgery. Settings and design: Prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary Care Eye Institute, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Materials and methods: The blitz anesthesia technique was applied to 15 non-English speaking patients (Vietnamese, Mandarin, Russian and Korean) during glaucoma surgery. With input from family members, a diagram was created for each patient. The diagram consisted of a translation and phonetic guide to pronunciation of common words or phrases in the patient\'s native language that might be used by the surgical team during the operation. Results: The blitz anesthesia technique worked well to provide patient comfort during the procedures. All patients reported adequate pain control and described their experience as comfortable. Additionally, patients reported feeling reassured that they were able to understand basic information from the surgical team during their case. This technique decreased patient anxiety prior to and during the surgical procedure. Conclusion: Blitz anesthesia provided adequate pain control with no complications. Key message: Blitz anesthesia with a phonetic language diagram, a less invasive technique of providing anesthesia in non-English speaking patients undergoing glaucoma surgery.


PDF Share
  1. Woloshin S, Bickell NA, Schwartz LM, Gany F, Welch HG. Language barriers in medicine in the United States. JAMA 1995 Mar;273(9):724-728.
  2. Greengold NL, Ault M. Crossing the cultural doctor patient barrier. Acad Med 1996 Feb;71(2):112-114.
  3. Goldberg M. Complications of anesthesia for ocular surgery Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006 Jun;19(2):293-307.
  4. Kansal S, Moster MR, Gomes MC, Schimidt Jr CM, Wilson RP. Patient Comfort with combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical and intracameral anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy and aqueous shunt surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2002 Nov-Dec;33(6):456-462.
  5. Cheng WY, Blum P, Spain B. Barriers to effective perioperative communication in indigenous Australians: An audit of progress since 1996. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004 Aug;32(4):542-547.
  6. Azuara-Blanco A, Moster MR, Marr B. Subconjunctival versus peribulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy: A prospective, randomized study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997;28: 896-98.
  7. Behndig A, Lindén C. Aqueous humor lidocaine concentrations in topical and intracameral anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998 Dec;24(12):1598-1601.
  8. Pablo LE, Ferreras A, Oliván SP, Larrossa JM, Gómez ML, Honrubia FM. Contact-topical plus intracameral lidocaine versus peribulbar anesthesia in combined surgery a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma 2004 Dec;13(6):510-515.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.