Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Ab Externo Transconjunctival XEN® 45 Gel Stent Implantation: Efficacy and Safety of a New Surgical Technique

Vittorio Pirani, Edoardo Cavallero, Claudia Cesari, Francesco Virgili, Vincenzo Ramovecchi

Keywords : Ab externo transconjunctival surgical approach, Glaucoma surgery, Microinvasive glaucoma surgery, Primary open-angle glaucoma, XEN® 45 gel stent implantation

Citation Information : Pirani V, Cavallero E, Cesari C, Virgili F, Ramovecchi V. Ab Externo Transconjunctival XEN® 45 Gel Stent Implantation: Efficacy and Safety of a New Surgical Technique. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024; 18 (3):94-97.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1443

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-10-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of XEN® 45 gel stent implantation with a new surgical approach by ab externo transconjunctival technique. Materials and methods: A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients affected with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were treated with an ab externo transconjunctival approach. All the XEN gel stent implantations were performed at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Hospital of San Severino Marche, AV3- Asur Marche, Macerata, Italy between January 2021 and May 2021, and the follow-up duration was at least 6 months. Results: A total of 31 eyes of 31 patients (mean age 65.6 ± 12.3 years; 20 males and 11 females) were included in the study. All the patients were affected by POAG. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 25.3 ± 3.8 mm Hg, and the mean number of IOP-lowering topical medications before surgery was 2.7 ± 0.9. No intraoperative complications were reported. During the follow-up, one patient received medical treatment for a choroidal detachment, one patient had a 2 mm hyphema, and one patient had a partial migration of the stent in the anterior chamber. At the 1-month follow-up, the mean IOP was 12.8 ± 2.5 mm Hg and no patient was on IOP-lowering treatment, while at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups, four patients were on treatment with one IOP-lowering drug. During the follow-up period, seven patients required postsurgical bleb needling, and one patient underwent a revision with PreserFlo® Microshunt implantation. The final mean IOP was 15.9 ± 2.7 mm Hg, and 27 out of 31 patients had an IOP of <18 mm Hg. Conclusion: Ab externo transconjunctival XEN® 45 gel stent implantation represents a safe and effective surgical treatment approach. Clinical significance: The ab externo approach represents a safe and effective technique, allowing early surgical timing and widening the group of patients who could benefit from the filtrating surgical technique before many years of topical medical treatment, which causes marked conjunctival alteration.


PDF Share
  1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014;121(11):2081–2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
  2. Leung EW, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2008;17(5):350–355. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f4f
  3. Fechtner RD, Godfrey DG, Budenz D, et al. Prevalence of ocular surface complaints in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications. Cornea 2010;29(6):618–621. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c325b2
  4. Hutnik C, Crichton A, Ford B, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in glaucoma patients treated previously with 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, equivalence clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2019;126(2):223–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.037
  5. Bettis DI, Whitehead JJ, Farhi P, et al. Intraocular pressure spike and corneal decompensation following selective laser trabeculoplasty in patients with exfoliation glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2016;25(4):e433–e437. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000340
  6. Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Chen PP, et al. Tube versus trabeculectomy and primary tube versus trabeculectomy study groups. comparing treatment outcomes from the tube versus trabeculectomy and primary tube versus trabeculectomy studies. Ophthalmology 2021;128(2):324–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.059
  7. Jampel HD, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Perioperative complications of trabeculectomy in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS). Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(1):16–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.013
  8. Wong SH, Panarelli JF. Update on microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2018;58(3):101–115. DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000229
  9. Tan NE, Tracer N, Terraciano A, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between ab interno and ab externo approaches to XEN gel stent placement. Clin Ophthalmol 2021;15:299–305. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S292007
  10. Scheres LMJ, Kujovic-Aleksov S, Ramdas WD, et al. XEN® gel stent compared to PreserFlo™ microshunt implantation for primary open-angle glaucoma: two-year results. Acta Ophthalmol 2021;99(3):e433–e440. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14602
  11. Purgert RJ, Lin MM, Mehran N, et al. Outcomes of ab interno versus ab externo XEN gel stent implantation. Presented at: American Glaucoma Society annual meeting; February 27–March 1, 2020; Washington, D.C.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.