Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Outcomes of Trainee-performed MIGS at Parkland Memorial Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Joseph Da, Matthew Gillings, Shivani Kamat, Niraj Nathan

Keywords : Cataract surgery, Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, Retrospective cohort study, Trainee outcomes

Citation Information : Da J, Gillings M, Kamat S, Nathan N. Outcomes of Trainee-performed MIGS at Parkland Memorial Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023; 17 (3):134-140.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1414

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 11-10-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aims and background: As the use of minimally invasive or microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) continues to expand, it is important to look at its outcomes in the hands of trainees. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy and endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP) with cataract extraction (CE) done by residents and fellows. Methods: All cases of KDB or ECP performed with CE between 2012 and 2020 at Parkland were reviewed, excluding cases with multiple MIGS procedures or other procedures. Results: A total of 153 eyes of 136 patients who underwent KDB and 125 eyes of 124 patients who underwent ECP were included. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 17.2 ± 5.2 at baseline to 15.4 ± 5.5 mm Hg at postoperative (post-op) month (POM) 12 in the KDB group (p = 0.02) and from 18.6 ± 6.3 at baseline to 15.1 ± 4.9 mm Hg at POM12 in the ECP group (p < 0.001), with wide variation in IOP change among subjects for both. The mean change in IOP across all time points was statistically significant for both groups. Medication counts were reduced from baseline at POMs 1, 3, and 6, but not 12, in both the KDB and ECP groups (p = 0.43 and p = 0.35, respectively). The rate of serious complications was very low; the most common complication was cystoid macular edema (CME) (six cases) and active inflammation beyond POM1 (15 cases) for KDB and ECP, respectively. Conclusion: Combined CE/MIGS procedures performed by trainees were safe but less efficacious in lowering IOP and medications compared to literature reporting outcomes of attending surgeons, apart from ECP/MIGS with regards to IOP lowering, which was found to be similarly efficacious. Clinical significance: Cataract extraction (CE) combined with KDB or ECP in the hands of trainees decreased mean IOP from baseline and was safe. IOP and medication reduction of MIGS/CE in the hands of trainees were overall lesser than reported values by attending surgeons.

  1. Nichani P, Popovic MM, Schlenker MB, et al. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a review of 3476 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 2021;66(5):714–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.09.005
  2. Agrawal P, Bradshaw SE. Systematic literature review of clinical and economic outcomes of micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (migs) in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther 2018;7(1):49–73. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-018-0131-0
  3. Yang SA, Mitchell W, Hall N, et al. Trends and usage patterns of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in the United States: IRIS® registry analysis 2013-2018. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2021;4(6):558–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.03.012
  4. Case log information: Ophthalmology - ACGME [Internet]. [cited 2023 2nd May]. Available from:
  5. Qiu M, Woreta F, Boland MV. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery in United States ophthalmology residency: surgical case log cross-sectional analysis and proposal for new glaucoma procedure classification. J Glaucoma 2021;30(7):621–628. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001846
  6. Qiu M, Boland MV, Woreta FA, et al. Deficiencies in ophthalmology residents’ case logging of glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2020;3(3):218–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.03.001
  7. Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, et al. The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125(9):1215–1219. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.9.1215
  8. Kim JY, Jo MW, Brauner SC, et al. Increased intraocular pressure on the first postoperative day following resident-performed cataract surgery. Eye(Lond) 2011;25(7):929–936. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.93
  9. Chan CK, Lee S, Sangani P, et al. Primary trabeculectomy surgery performed by residents at a county hospital. J Glaucoma 2007;16(1):52–56. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000243473.59084.dd
  10. Kwong A, Law SK, Kule RR, et al. Long-term outcomes of resident- versus attending-performed primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in a United States residency program. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157(6):1190–1201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.028
  11. Wang JCC, Campos-Möller X, Shah M, et al. Effect of endocyclophotocoagulation on refractive outcomes in angle-closure eyes after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract and Refract Surg 2016;42(1):132–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.046
  12. Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract and Refract Surg 2014;40(8):1313–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021
  13. Smith M, Byles D, Lim LA. Phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation in uncontrolled glaucoma: three-year results. J Cataract and Refract Surg 2018;44(9):1097–1102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.025
  14. Siegel MJ, Boling WS, Faridi OS, et al. Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma: ECP and phaco versus phaco alone. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;43(6):531–539. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12510
  15. Dorairaj SK, Kahook MY, Williamson BK, et al. A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:791–797. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S158403
  16. Iwasaki K, Kakimoto H, Orii Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of a Kahook Dual Blade procedure combined with phacoemulsification in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Clin Med 2022;11(5):1354. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051354
  17. Porter M, Garza A, Gallardo M. Excisional goniotomy in Latino patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes through 24 months. Clin Ophthalmol 2020;14:3619–3625. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S271923
  18. Meer E, Liu T, Hua P, et al. Outcomes of resident performed Hydrus, iStent, and Kahook glaucoma procedures in a predominantly African American population. J Glaucoma 2022;31(1):23–30. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001958
  19. Pratte EL, Landreneau JR, Hirabayashi MT, et al. Comparison of 12-month outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade excisional goniotomy performed by attending versus resident surgeons. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020;12(2):e181–e187. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717055
  20. Friedman DS, He M. Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53(3):250–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.10.012
  21. Aoki R, Hirooka K, Goda E, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between microhook ab interno trabeculotomy and goniotomy with the kahook dual blade in combination with phacoemulsification: a retrospective, comparative case series. Adv Ther 2021;38(1):329–336. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01543-3
  22. Lee D, King J, Thomsen S, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between excisional goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade and iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent in combination with phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol 2019;13:2097–2102. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S224109
  23. Baumgarten S, Plange N, Htoon HM, et al. Outcomes of combined single-use dual blade goniotomy and cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2022;42(9):2685–2696. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02257-x
  24. Elfersy AJ, Prinzi RA, Peracha ZH, et al. IOP elevation after cataract surgery: results for residents and senior staff at Henry Ford Health System. J Glaucoma 2016;25(10):802–806. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000421
  25. Oliveira-Ferreira C, Leuzinger-Dias M, Tavares Ferreira J, et al. Cataract phacoemulsification performed by resident trainees and staff surgeons: intraoperative complications and early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020;46(4):555–561. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000105
  26. Ung C, Murakami Y, Zhang E, et al. The association between compliance with recommended follow-up and glaucomatous disease severity in a county hospital population. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156(2):362–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.005
  27. Salinas L, Chaudhary A, Berdahl JP, et al. Goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 6-month outcomes. J Glaucoma 2018;27(10):849–855. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001019
  28. Vlasnik JJ, Aliotta SL, DeLor B. Medication adherence: factors influencing compliance with prescribed medication plans. Case Manager 2005;16(2):47–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.casemgr.2005.01.009
  29. Ansari E, Loganathan D. 12-month clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and ab interno trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in the United Kingdom. PLoS ONE 2021;16(6):e0252826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252826
  30. Yap TE, Zollet P, Husein S, et al. Endocyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification in surgically naive primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year results. Eye(Lond) 2022;36(10):1890–1895. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01734-4
  31. Cohen A, Wong SH, Patel S, et al. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2017;62(3):357–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.09.004
  32. Van Tassel SH, Chen D. An update on microinvasive glaucoma surgery concurrent with cataract extraction. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 2019;7(4):224–232. DOI: 10.1007/s40135-019-00220-1
  33. Dorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. 12-month outcomes of goniotomy performed using the Kahook Dual Blade combined with cataract surgery in eyes with medically-treated glaucoma. Adv Ther 2018;35(9):1460–1469. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0755-4
  34. Chen J, Cohn RA, Lin SC, et al. Endoscopic photocoagulation of the ciliary body for treatment of refractory glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124(6):787–796. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71696-4
  35. Melancia D, Abegão Pinto L, Marques-Neves C. Cataract surgery and intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Res 2015;53(3):141–148. DOI: 10.1159/000377635
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.