SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles
Sahar A Amoozadeh, Michael C Yang, Ken Y Lin
Keywords : Gel stent, Glaucoma, Surgery, Tube shunt, XEN
Citation Information : Amoozadeh SA, Yang MC, Lin KY. A Case of Refractory Open-angle Glaucoma with Failed Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant and Trabeculectomy Treated with Ab Externo XEN Gel Stent Placement. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022; 16 (3):192-194.
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Published Online: 23-01-2023
Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).
Aim: We report a case of successful intraocular pressure (IOP) management in a patient with refractory primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) following implantation of XEN gel implant in the same hemisphere as prior failed filtering surgeries [i.e., Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI) and trabeculectomy bleb)]. Background: Glaucoma is a major cause of blindness worldwide and is typically associated with elevated IOP and retinal ganglion cell loss. Treatment centers around decreasing IOP with eye drops and surgical interventions. The advent of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) has expanded therapeutic options for patients who have failed traditional treatments. The XEN gel implant creates a shunt between the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival or sub-tenon's space, allowing for drainage of aqueous humor without significant tissue disruption. Given that the XEN gel implant also results in bleb formation, it is generally recommended to avoid placement in the same quadrant of prior filtering surgeries. Case description: A 77-year-old man with a 15-year history of severe POAG of OU presents with persistently elevated IOP despite multiple filtering surgeries and maximal eye drop regimen. The patient had a superotemporal BGI in OU and a scarred trabeculectomy bleb superiorly in the right eye (OD). He underwent an open conjunctiva ab externo XEN gel implant placement in the OD in the same hemisphere as previous filtering surgeries. At 12 months postoperatively, the IOP range continues to be maintained within goal without complications. Conclusion: The XEN gel implant can be successfully placed in the same hemisphere as prior filtering surgeries and can achieve goal IOP without any surgical complications at 12 months postoperatively. Clinical significance: A XEN gel implant can effectively lower patients’ IOP and can be a unique surgical option in refractory cases of POAG with multiple failed filtering surgeries, even when inserted in close proximity to prior filtering surgeries.