Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Estimating the Ideal Treatment Protocol and Success Predictors for Double-session Micropulse Transscleral Laser for Glaucoma Management

Leopoldo Magacho, Francisco E Lima, Marcos P Ávila

Keywords : Glaucoma, Intraocular pressure, Laser, Micropulse trasscleral cyclophotocoagulation

Citation Information : Magacho L, Lima FE, Ávila MP. Estimating the Ideal Treatment Protocol and Success Predictors for Double-session Micropulse Transscleral Laser for Glaucoma Management. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022; 16 (2):111-116.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1375

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To identify the ideal treatment protocol and success predictors for double-session micropulse transscleral (MP3) laser for glaucoma management. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent double-session MP3, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were retrospectively investigated. Logistic regression analysis was used to verify preoperative success predictors. The following comparisons were made: (1) Between eyes that obtained surgical success vs failure, (2) According to the time required for MP3, and (3) Considering only eyes that required retreatment. Results: A total of 191 eyes from 148 patients were included. The preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly higher than at last follow-up visit (27.3 ± 6.9 vs 14.6 ± 6.0 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Success was observed in 90.5% of the eyes. On logistic regression analysis with preoperative IOP and MP3 time as independent variables, only previous IOP was identified as a statistically significant factor (p = 0.004), with lower IOP relating to higher success. Eyes that required lower MP3 time underwent more MP3 procedures than those with higher MP3 time (1.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.03). In the 36 eyes that underwent retreatment, preoperative IOP was higher (31.6 ± 7.4 vs 26.3 ± 6.4 mm Hg, p < 0.001); eyes with successful IOP treatment had a higher MP3 treatment time at the first surgery than eyes with failed IOP correction (364.1 ± 68.2 vs 330.0 ± 18.0 seconds, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Thus, an ideal double-session MP3 protocol should use a high laser energy at the first surgery, and a high preoperative IOP can be considered as a predictor of surgical failure. Clinical significance: This is the first study to give special attention to the double-session MP3 protocol and success predictors.


PDF Share
  1. Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC, et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;38(3):266–272. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02238.x
  2. Aquino MCD, Barton K, Tan AMWT, et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;43(1):40–46. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12360
  3. Kuchar S, Moster MR, Reamer CB, et al. Treatment outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in advanced glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci 2016;31(2):393–396. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-015-1856-9
  4. Emanuel ME, Grover DS, Fellman RL, et al. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation: initial results in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2017;26(8):726–729. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000715
  5. Lee JH, Shi Y, Amoozgar B, et al. Outcome of micropulse laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation on pediatric versus adult glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2017;26(10):936–939. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000757
  6. Williams AL, Moster MR, Rahmatnejad K, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety profile of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2018;27(5):445–449. DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000934
  7. Yelenskiy A, Gillette TB, Arosemena A, et al. Patient outcomes following micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: intermediate term results. J Glaucoma 2018;27(10):920–925. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001023
  8. Jammal AA, Costa DC, Vasconcellos JPC, et al. Prospective evaluation of micropulse transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: 1 year results. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2019;82(5):381–388. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20190076
  9. Magacho L, Lima FE, Avila MP. Double-session micropulse transscleral laser (CYCLO G6) for the treatment of glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35(7):1469–1475. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02922-1
  10. Nguyen AT, Maslin J, Noecker RJ. Early results of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020;30(4):700–705. DOI: 10.1177/1120672119839303
  11. Sarrafpour S, Saleh D, Ayoub, S, et al. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: a look at long-term effectiveness and outcomes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2019;2(3):167–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.02.002
  12. Souissi S, Baudouin C, Labbé A, et al. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using a standard protocol in patients with refractory glaucoma naive of cyclodestruction. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31(1):112–119. DOI: 10.1177/1120672119877586
  13. Varikuti VNV, Shah P, Rai O, et al. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in eyes with good central vision. J Glaucoma 2019;28(10):901–905. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001339
  14. Zaarour K, Abdelmassih Y, Arej N, et al. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in uncontrolled glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2019;28(3):270–275. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001174
  15. de Crom RMPC, Slangen CGMM, Kujovic-Aleksov S, et al. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in patients with glaucoma: 1- and 2-year treatment outcomes. J Glaucoma 2020;29(9):794–798. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001552
  16. Magacho L, Lima FE, Avila MP. Double-session micropulse transscleral laser (CYCLO G6) as a primary surgical procedure for glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2020;29(3):205–210. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001426
  17. Preda MA, Karancsi OL, Munteanu M, et al. Clinical outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma-18 months follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 2020;35(7):1487–1491. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02934-x
  18. Tekeli O, Köse HC. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31(3):1113–1121. DOI: 10.1177/1120672120914231
  19. Vig N, Ameen S, Bloom P, et al. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: initial results using a reduced energy protocol in refractory glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258(5):1073–1079. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04611-0
  20. Garcia GA, Nguyen CV, Yelenskiy A, et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: short-term efficacy, safety, and impact of surgical history on outcomes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2019;2(6):402–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.009
  21. Sanchez FG, Peirano-Bonomi JC, Grippo TM. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: a hypothesis for the ideal parameters. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2018; 7(3):94–100. PMID: 30386797; PMCID: PMC6205680.
  22. Sanchez FG, Peirano-Bonomi JC, Barbosa BN, et al. Update on micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma 2020;29(7):598–603. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001539
  23. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis, Missouri, USA; 1993.
  24. Cross EM, Chaffin WW. Use of the binomial theorem in interpreting results of multiple tests of significance. Edu Psychol Meas 1982;42(1):25–34. DOI: 10.1177/0013164482421003
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.