Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Spectralis OCT1 versus OCT2: Time Efficiency and Image Quality of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Bruch\'s Membrane Opening Analysis for Glaucoma Patients

Fabian Bosche, Jil Andresen, Daniel Li, Frank Holz, Christian Brinkmann

Keywords : Bruch\'s membrane opening, Glaucoma, Optical coherence tomography, Retinal nerve fiber layer, Spectralis

Citation Information : Bosche F, Andresen J, Li D, Holz F, Brinkmann C. Spectralis OCT1 versus OCT2: Time Efficiency and Image Quality of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Bruch\'s Membrane Opening Analysis for Glaucoma Patients. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2019; 13 (1):16-20.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1244

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose: To compare two generations of Heidelberg SPECTRALIS optical coherence tomography (OCT) technologies (SPECTRALIS OCT1 and OCT2) with regard to time efficiency and image quality of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and Bruch\'s membrane opening (BMO) analysis in individuals with glaucoma. Materials and methods: In this single center, prospective cohort study, 35 consecutive glaucoma patients (70 eyes) were included. RNFL thickness and BMO-MRW analysis was performed in all patients using the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS OCT1 and the Heidelberg SPECTRALIS OCT2 module. Each patient was imaged three times both with the SPECTRALIS-OCT1 and the SPECTRALIS-OCT2 device. All scans were assessed for further analyzability. Acquisition duration, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the displacement between the initially localized and the redetermined BMO center were extracted from the measurement protocols and statistically compared. Results: Mean (cumulative) scan acquisition duration was significantly higher with OCT1 compared with OCT2 (54.80 ± 18.61 seconds vs 20.40 ± 6.61 seconds; p < 0.01). Patient-related comparison showed a lower scan duration with the OCT2 device in all 35 patients. Mean SNR of the OCT1 images was 29.9 dB and 32.3 dB for the OCT2 images. The difference of −2.4 (95% CI: −3.1 to 2) was highly significant (p < 0.001). Mean displacement of the OCT1 images was 42.9 ìm and 40.2 ìm for the OCT2 images (95% CI: −4.710; p = 0.479). Conclusion: With SPECTRALIS OCT2, acquisition time of BMO and RNFL scans is less than half of the acquisition time of SPECTRALIS OCT1. Image quality of OCT2 module is at least equivalent to the image quality of OCT1.


PDF Share
  1. Vizzeri G, Kjaergaard SM, et al. Role of imaging in glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59(Suppl 1):S59–S68.
  2. Reznicek L, Burzer S, et al. Structure-function relationship comparison between retinal nerve fibre layer and Bruch's membrane openingminimum rim width in glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(10): 1534–1538. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.09.
  3. Silverman AL, Hammel N, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Spectralis and Cirrus Reference Databases in Differentiating between Healthy and Early Glaucoma Eyes. Ophthalmology 2016;123(2):408–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.047.
  4. Chauhan BC, O'Leary N, et al. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology 2013;120(3):535–543. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.055.
  5. Budenz DL, Michael A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005;112(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.06.039.
  6. Chen H-Y, Huang M-L. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography in Taiwan Chinese subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243(9):894–902. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-1140-y.
  7. Jeoung JW, Park KH, et al. Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology 2005;112(12):2157–2163. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.07.012.
  8. Bussel II, Wollstein G, et al. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98(Suppl 2):ii15–ii19. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304326.
  9. Chen TC. Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Optic Nerve Head and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (An AOS Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2009;107:254–281.
  10. Bengtsson B, Andersson S, et al. Performance of time-domain and spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography for glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90(4):310–315. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755- 3768.2010.01977.x.
  11. Cereda MG, Corvi F, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography 2: Diagnostic Tool To Study Peripheral Vitreoretinal Pathologies. Retina 2019 Feb;39(2):415–421. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001953.
  12. Vizzeri G, Bowd C, et al. Effect of signal strength and improper alignment on the variability of stratus optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148(2):249–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.002.
  13. Valverde-Megías A, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Clinical relevance of foveal location on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using the new FoDi software in spectralis optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54(8):5771–5776. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12440.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.