Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

OutƒPow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration

Jessica Olayanju, Teresa Borras, Bahjat Qaqish, David Fleischman

Keywords : Aqueous shunt, Baerveldt, Fenestration, Venting slit

Citation Information : Olayanju J, Borras T, Qaqish B, Fleischman D. OutƒPow Facility in Tube Shunt Fenestration. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2018; 12 (3):113-118.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1234

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: Determination of the effect of varying fenestration technique, and simulated patch graft on outflow facility for Baerveldt tube. Materials and methods: Silicone tubing similar to Baerveldt implant (AMO, Santa Ana, CA) with different fenestrations techniques was connected to a digital manometer in a closed system with a fluid-filled syringe on a stand to adjust pressure. The venting slits included: (A) 4 piercings with 7–0 TG140-8 needle; (B) a 2-mm slit with a 15° blade; (C) 4 piercings with a 15° blade; (D) 9–0 Nylon on CS140-6 needle with suture stenting the fenestration. Results: For pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg in groups A to D, the average outflow facility (mL/min/mm Hg) were group A: 0.11, 0.20, 0.28, 0.40; group B: 0.30, 0.69, 0.98, 0.93; group C: 0.73, 0.80, 0.81, 0.88; group D: 0.58, 0.65, 0.80, 0.87. For external compression with 10 gram weights at pressures of 10, 20, 30, 40 mm Hg, outflow were group A: 0.0, 0.18, 0.20, 0.53; group B: 0.75, 0.70, 0.97, 1.21. Group C: 0.18, 0.03, 0.57, 0.04. Group D: 0.73, 0.90, 1.13, 0.91. Conclusion: Effectivity of venting slits in maintaining adequate IOP in the early postoperative period for non-valved glaucoma implant is variable, multifactorial and largely intraocular pressure (IOP) dependent. Clinical significance: This study explores methods of producing fenestration and the effects on outflow at different pressures in an attempt to determine which fenestration technique has more reproducible results that can be made applicable in clinical practice. This is also the first study to evaluate the effect of external pressures similar to scleral patch graft on the tube fenestrations.


PDF Share
  1. Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, et al. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology 2007;114(12): 2265-2270.
  2. Desai MA, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society in 2008. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42(3): 202-208.
  3. Joshi AB, Parrish RK, Feuer WF. 2002 survey of the American Glaucoma Society: practice preferences for glaucoma surgery and antifibrotic use. J Glaucoma 2005;14(2): 172-174.
  4. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(5):789-803.
  5. Gedde SJ, Lee RK. Comparing glaucoma drainage implants. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:875-877.
  6. Hong CH, Arosemena A, Zurakowski D, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices: a systemic literature review and current controversies. Surv Ophthalmolol 2005;50:48-60.
  7. Choritz L, Koynov K, Renieri G, et al. Surface topographies of glaucoma drainage devices and their influence on human tenon fibroblast adhesion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4047-4053.
  8. Christakis PG, Kalenak JW, Zurakowski D, et al. The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: One-year Treatment Outcomes. Ophthalmology 2011;118(11):2180-2189.
  9. Sherwood MB, Smith MF. Prevention of early hypotony associated with Molteno implants by a new occluding stent technique. Ophthalmology 1993;100:85–90.
  10. Rietveld E, van der Veen AJ. Postoperative pressure regulation in glaucoma shunt surgery: focal tube constriction is not the answer. J Glaucoma 2004 Jun;13(3):216-220.
  11. Kansal S, Moster MR, Kim D, et al. Effectiveness of nonocclusive ligature and fenestration used in Baerveldt aqueous shunts for early postoperative intraocular pressure control. J Glaucoma 2002;11(1):65-70.
  12. Arismendi GEO, Valderrama CPP, Albis-Donado O. Results of a new technique for implantation of nonrestrictive glaucoma devices. J Current Glaucoma Practice 2013;7(3):130-135.
  13. Trible JR, Brown DB. Occlusive Ligature and Standardized Fenestration of a Baerveldt Tube with and without Antimetabolites for early postoperative intraocular pressure control. Ophthalmology 1998;105(12):2243-2250.
  14. Emerik GT, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL. Tube fenestration in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant surgery: 1-year results compared with standard implant surgery. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:340-346.
  15. Rose GE, Lavin MJ, Hitchings RA. Silicone tubes in glaucoma surgery: the effect of technical modifications on early postoperative intraocular pressures and complications. Eye. 1989;3:553-561.
  16. Vinod K, Brandt JD, Gedde SJ, et al. Tube Fenestration in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Ophthalmology 2016;123(10):2260-2262.
  17. Brooks SE, Dacey MP, Lee MB, et al. Modification of the glaucoma drainage implant to prevent early postoperative hypertension and hypotony: a laboratory study. Ophthalmic Surg 1994;25:311-316.
  18. Yadgarov A, Menezes A, Botwinick A, et al. Suture Stenting of a Tube Fenestration for Early Intraocular Pressure Control After Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant Surgery. J Glaucoma 2018;27(3):291-296.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.